Ionic Legal is delighted to announce a strong set of results in the Legal 500 2027 rankings, reflecting the team’s continued growth, depth of expertise, and dedication to client service.
Flake Bake Ltd Secures Legal Victory in Trade Mark Dispute
Ionic Legal secures trade mark win for Flake Bake, defeating rival’s challenge and invalidating its earlier registration
Can directors be liable for intellectual property infringement?
Company directors are not automatically protected from personal liability when their business infringes intellectual property rights, and this article explores when and why directors can be named alongside their company in trade mark or copyright claims.
Paul Cox appointed to ECTA Supervisory Board
Ionic Legal co-founder and partner Paul Cox has joined the Supervisory Board of ECTA, representing the UK for the 2026-2027 term.
Jellycat Sues Next, Hamleys and Bessie London: Can Trade Mark Law Protect a Toy’s “Look and Feel”?
Jellycat has issued High Court proceedings against Next, Hamleys and Bessie London, but with no registered design protection for its toys’ appearance, proving infringement may be an uphill battle.
IP STARS lists Ionic Legal in firm and partner rankings
Managing IP’s guide to the global intellectual property law market, IP STARS, has acknowledged Ionic Legal in its 2026 Western Europe rankings.
The Top Ten Most Commonly Asked Questions About Copyright
Ionic Legal’s Guide to TheTop Ten Most Commonly Asked Questions About Copyright
Getty v Stability AI: The Core Question on AI Training Remains Unanswered
The High Court has ruled in Getty Images v Stability AI, but businesses should not mistake a judgment for clarity.
Celebrating Two Years of Ionic Legal
Two years on, Ionic Legal has grown steadily by delivering practical, client-focused legal advice. The firm continues to expand while offering a modern alternative to traditional legal services.
Public Art, Private Rights: The Copyright Question Behind Sunderland’s Away Kit
A dispute between Sunderland AFC and a Liverpool artist has raised a question about when a drawing inspiration from a public artwork crosses into copyright infringement.