IP-2025-000043

Claim No: IP-2025-000043
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (ChD)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENTERPRISE COURT
BEFORE:
DATE:
B E T W E E N:
WHITE FOX BOUTIQUE PTY LIMITED
Claimant
-and-
(1) JUSTYOUROUTFIT (MCR) LTD
(2) MR JAGTAR SINGH DHALIWAL
(3) J5HOLLAND LIMITED
(4) MR SATNAM SINGH KAILA

Defendants

CONSENT ORDER

PENAL NOTICE
IF YOU, THE FIRST AND THIRD DEFENDANTS, OR YOUR
DIRECTORS OR OFFICERS OR SERVANTS OR OTHERWISE,
DISOBEY THIS ORDER OR INSTRUCT OR ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO
2
BREACH THIS ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF
COURT AND MAY BE FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED AND
YOUR DIRECTORS OR OFFICERS OR SERVANTS OR OTHERWISE
MAY BE IMPRISONED.
IF YOU, THE SECOND AND FOURTH DEFENDANTS, DISOBEY THIS
ORDER OR INSTRUCT OR ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO BREACH THIS
ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND
MAY BE IMPRISONED, FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED.
ANY OTHER PERSON WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER AND DOES
ANYTHING WHICH HELPS OR PERMITS THE DEFENDANTS OR ANY
OF THEM TO BREACH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY ALSO BE
HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED,
FINED OR HAVE THEIR ASSETS SEIZED.
UPON the application by the Claimant by Application Notice dated [ ] (the
“Application”)
AND UPON the parties having agreed terms of settlement
BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. The Defendants, and each of them, by virtue of their acts have infringed UK
    Trade Mark No. WO0000001762363 (the “Claimant’s Mark”).
  2. The First and Third Defendants, whether acting by themselves, their directors,
    officers, servants or agents or otherwise howsoever, and the Second and Fourth
    Defendants, whether acting by themselves, their servants or agents or otherwise
    howsoever, shall not do or authorise the following acts or any of them, namely:
    (a) manufacture, offer for sale, sell, import, or export in the course of
    trade any goods bearing the Claimant’s Mark or any confusingly
    3
    similar trade mark which has not originated from the Claimant (the
    “Infringing Goods”); and/or
    (b) infringe the Claimant’s Mark; and/or
    (c) authorise or procure any act that would breach the injunctions at
    paragraphs 2(a) and 2(b) above.
  3. The Defendants, and each of them, shall, within 14 days of the date of this
    Order, make and serve on the Claimant’s solicitors a statutory declaration
    (sworn and signed by the Second and Fourth Defendants in their personal
    capacities and by a director or other proper officer of the First and Third
    Defendants) setting out the following information to the best of their knowledge
    and belief:
    (a) the full names and addresses of all or any concerns who have
    supplied or delivered any of the Infringing Goods to any of the
    Defendants and any concerns to whom any of the Defendants have
    sold or otherwise supplied more than 10 of the Infringing Goods;
    (b) full and clear copies of all purchase orders, invoices, delivery notes,
    documents and records within each of the Defendants’ possession,
    power or control relating to all such dealings in the Infringing
    Goods; and
    (c) the precise number of Infringing Goods which each of the
    Defendants have: (i) purchased, been supplied with or otherwise
    taken delivery of together with all relevant prices thereof; and (ii)
    sold or otherwise supplied or disposed of together with all relevant
    prices thereof and the profit made on those sales.
  4. The Defendants, and each of them, shall within 14 days of the date of this Order,
    deliver up and forfeit to the Claimant at each of the Defendants’ expense and to
    an address in the United Kingdom to be specified by the Claimant any and all
    4
    products, material, articles or documents that are in the power, possession,
    custody or control of the Defendants, and each of them, the use of which would
    be a breach of any of the injunctions at paragraph (2) above.
  5. The Defendants shall, jointly and severally, pay damages or an account of
    profits (at the election of the Claimant) to the Claimant to be assessed at an
    inquiry if not agreed.
  6. The Defendants shall, jointly and severally, pay the Claimant’s costs to be
    assessed if not agreed.
  7. The First and Third Defendants shall display on their website, social media
    channels and at their premises in a prominent position the notice set out in
    Annex 1.
  8. The Claimant will serve this Order on each the Defendants.
    Dated this day of
    Signed:
    ………………………..
    ANDREW STONE
    Partner, Ionic Legal
    Solicitors for and on behalf of the
    Claimant
    ……………..
    MR JAGTAR SINGH DHALIWAL, Director,
    For and on behalf of the First Defendant
    ………………………..
    MR JAGTAR SINGH DHALIWAL
    5
    the Second Defendant
    ……………..
    MR SATNAM SINGH KAILA, Director,
    For and on behalf of the Third Defendant
    ………………………..
    MR SATNAM SINGH KAILA
    the Fourth Defendant
    Service
    The Court has provided a sealed copy of this Order to the serving party: Ionic Legal,
    110 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AY (LUT0042) – Paul.Cox@ioniclegal.co.uk;
    Andrew.Stone@ioniclegal.co.uk
    Solicitors for the Claimant
    6
    ANNEX 1
    The Claimant, White Fox Boutique Limited, issued proceedings on 29 April 2025
    against Justyouroutfit (MCR) Limited and its director Mr Jagtar Singh Dhaliwal
    and J5Holland Limited and its director Mr Satnam Singh Kaila (the “Defendants”)
    due to the offer for sale and sale by the Defendants of counterfeit clothing bearing
    the “White Fox” trade mark.
    The Defendants accept that they infringed the Claimant’s trade mark by the offer
    for sale and sale of the counterfeit clothing and passed off those goods as being the
    Claimant’s goods when they were not. The Defendants have settled the claim and
    agreed not to infringe the Claimant’s trade mark rights in the future and have agreed
    to pay damages and costs to the Claimant.
    A copy of the Order can be found at the following link: